Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 767-300ER vs. Boeing 787-8

vs.
Compare

767-300ER

vs.

787-8

Price (USD)
$105 Million$224 Million
First Flight
19862009
Body Type
Wide-bodyWide-body
Length
54 m180 ft
56 m186 ft
Wingspan
47 m156 ft
60 m197 ft
Wing Area
283 m²3,049 ft²
377 m²4,058 ft²
Fuselage Width
5 m16 ft
5 m18 ft
Height
15 m51 ft
16 m55 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
186,900 kg412,044 lbs
227,900 kg502,433 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
Pratt & Whitney PW4000 / General Electric CF6 / Rolls-Royce RB211General Electric GEnx / Rolls-Royce Trent 1000
Max Thrust Per Engine
274 kN61,500 lbf
280 kN64,000 lbf
Max Total Thrust
548 kN123,000 lbf
560 kN128,000 lbf
Fuel Capacity
90,700 l23,960 gal
126,200 l33,339 gal
Range
11,070 km5,977 nm
13,620 km7,354 nm
Cruise Speed
850 km/h528 mph
903 km/h561 mph
Typical Seating
261 pax242 pax
Max Seating
351 pax381 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 767-300ER and Boeing 787-8

Boeing 767-300ER vs Boeing 787-8 Size Comparison

  • At 56.70 meters, the Boeing 787-8 is 1.80 meters longer than the Boeing 767-300ER.
  • With a wingspan of 60.10 meters, the Boeing 787-8 is 12.50 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 767-300ER and Boeing 787-8 have heights of 15.80 meters and 16.90 meters respectively - making the Boeing 787-8 1.10 meters taller.

Boeing 767-300ER vs Boeing 787-8 Range

  • Boeing 787-8’s range of 13,620 kilometers is greater than Boeing 767-300ER’s range of 11,070 kilometers. Therefore, the Boeing 787-8 can fly nonstop approximately 2,550 kilometers further.
  • The Boeing 787-8 can hold 33,339 gallons of fuel, which is 9,379 gallons more than the Boeing 767-300ER’s tank capacity of 23,960 gallons.

Boeing 767-300ER vs Boeing 787-8 Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Boeing 767-300ER can accommodate 261 passengers, which is about 19 passengers more than Boeing 787-8’s seating capacity.
  • The Boeing 787-8’s max seating capacity is 381 passengers, compared to 351 passengers of the Boeing 767-300ER.

About the Boeing 767-300ER

The Boeing 767-300ER, an extended-range variant of the 767 family, entered service in 1988 as a response to the growing demand for efficient and versatile wide-body aircraft. This model, with its significant enhancements in range and capacity, has become a staple in the fleets of various airlines for long-haul operations. At its peak in the 1990's, a brand new 767-300ER was valued at roughly $85 million.

With a length of 54.9 meters (180.2 feet) and a wingspan of 47.6 meters (156.2 feet), the 767-300ER is designed for operational efficiency in both airport compatibility and aerodynamics. The wing area of 283.3 square meters (3049.4 square feet) contributes to the aircraft's stable and efficient flight characteristics, especially over extended distances.

The -300ER's increased range was made possible by larger fuel tanks and a higher max takeoff weight (MTOW) of 407,000 lbs (185,000 kgs). The updated variant has a fuel capacity of 90,700 liters (23,960 US gallons), allowing it to cover distances of up to 11,070 kilometers (5,977 nautical miles). This capability makes it particularly suitable for transcontinental and transoceanic routes, offering airlines the flexibility to connect distant cities with fewer stops. Engines options for the -300ER included Pratt & Whitney PW4000s, General Electric CF6s, or Rolls-Royce RB211s. These were capable of a total maximum thrust of 548.0 kN (123,000 lbf). The aircraft exhibits robust performance, necessary for long-haul flights carrying a full load of both passengers and cargo.

The cabin of the 767-300ER is designed to typically seat 261 passengers in a dual-class layout, with the potential to accommodate up to 351 passengers in a high-density configuration. The typical layout includes a spacious business class and a larger economy class, often arranged in a 2-3-2 seat configuration, balancing passenger comfort and density.

Competing in the wide-body market, the Boeing 767-300ER has faced competition from aircraft such as the Airbus A330 and the smaller A300. These models offer similar long-range capabilities and passenger capacities, making the market segment highly competitive. Many carriers have operated the 767-300ER, including Delta Air Lines, United Airlines, British Airways, Japan Airlines, and All Nippon Airways. These carriers have leveraged the aircraft's range and capacity to effectively serve a variety of long-haul routes, underlining its role as a versatile and reliable option in their fleet.

The Boeing 767-300ER's introduction and subsequent service record reflect its importance in the evolution of wide-body aircraft, particularly in the context of long-haul commercial aviation. Its combination of range, capacity, and operational flexibility has solidified its position as a significant player in the global aviation industry.

About the Boeing 787-8

The Boeing 787-8, as the first variant of the revolutionary 787 Dreamliner series, marked a new chapter in commercial aviation when it took to the skies in 2009. This modern wide-body twinjet made its introduction into commercial aviation in 2011 with All Nippon Airways. Since then, the entire Dreamliner family has been pivotal for efficient, point-to-point routes.

Spanning 56.7 meters (186.1 feet) in length with a wingspan of 60.1 meters (197.2 feet), the 787-8 is distinguished by its sleek and aerodynamic design. The aircraft boasts a wing area of 377.0 square meters (4058.0 square feet), which plays a critical role in its fuel-efficient performance. One of the most notable features of the 787-8 is its extensive use of composite materials, including carbon fiber reinforced polymer, accounting for a significant portion of its primary structure. This use of advanced materials results in a lighter airframe, leading to reductions in fuel consumption and operational costs, while also enhancing structural strength and durability. From the outside, 787s are discernible by their rounded noses, raked wingtips, and engine chevrons (serrated edges).

Equipped with either General Electric GEnx or Rolls-Royce Trent 1000 engines, the 787-8 offers a total maximum thrust of 560.0 kN (128,000 lbf). These engines, combined with the aircraft's optimized aerodynamics, enable it to achieve a range of approximately 13,620 kilometers (7,354 nautical miles). This extended range, coupled with its fuel efficiency, makes the 787-8 a viable option for airlines to operate long-haul flights with lower environmental impact.

Inside, the Boeing 787-8 typically seats 242 passengers in a standard three-class configuration, but it can accommodate up to 381 passengers in a high-density setup. The cabin of the 787-8 has been designed with passenger comfort at its core, featuring larger windows that are electronically dimmable, higher humidity levels, and a lower cabin altitude pressure. These features significantly enhance the passenger experience, particularly on long-duration flights, by reducing fatigue and improving overall comfort.

The 787-8 competes in the commercial aviation market with aircraft such as the Airbus A330-900neo. Its introduction was a strategic move by Boeing to provide airlines with an aircraft that combines operational efficiency with advanced passenger comfort amenities. The aircraft's innovative design and environmental considerations have made it a preferred choice for various airlines, including All Nippon Airways, United Airlines, Air Canada, Etihad Airways, and LATAM Chile. These carriers have utilized the 787-8's capabilities to effectively serve a broad range of international and transcontinental routes.

The development and deployment of the Boeing 787-8 have been characterized by a shift towards more sustainable and efficient air travel. Its use of cutting-edge materials, coupled with state-of-the-art systems, represents a significant advancement in aircraft design. As a result, the 787-8 has set new standards in terms of operational efficiency, reduced carbon emissions, and enhanced passenger comfort, thereby playing a pivotal role in the evolution of modern long-haul aviation.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.