Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 737-300 vs. Boeing 767-200ER

vs.
Compare

737-300

vs.

767-200ER

Price (USD)
$45 Million$89 Million
First Flight
19841984
Body Type
Narrow-bodyWide-body
Length
33 m109 ft
48 m159 ft
Wingspan
28 m94 ft
47 m156 ft
Wing Area
105 m²1,134 ft²
283 m²3,049 ft²
Fuselage Width
3 m12 ft
5 m16 ft
Height
11 m36 ft
15 m51 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
63,300 kg139,553 lbs
179,200 kg395,068 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
CFMI CFM56P&W PW4000, JT8D / General Electric CF6 / Rolls-Royce RB211
Max Thrust Per Engine
98 kN22,000 lbf
270 kN60,600 lbf
Max Total Thrust
196 kN44,000 lbf
540 kN121,200 lbf
Fuel Capacity
20,100 l5,310 gal
91,380 l24,140 gal
Range
4,400 km2,376 nm
12,200 km6,587 nm
Cruise Speed
796 km/h495 mph
850 km/h528 mph
Typical Seating
128 pax216 pax
Max Seating
149 pax290 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 737-300 and Boeing 767-200ER

Boeing 737-300 vs Boeing 767-200ER Size Comparison

  • At 48.50 meters, the Boeing 767-200ER is 15.10 meters longer than the Boeing 737-300.
  • With a wingspan of 47.60 meters, the Boeing 767-200ER is 18.80 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 737-300 and Boeing 767-200ER have heights of 11.10 meters and 15.80 meters respectively - making the Boeing 767-200ER 4.70 meters taller.

Boeing 737-300 vs Boeing 767-200ER Range

  • Boeing 767-200ER’s range of 12,200 kilometers is greater than Boeing 737-300’s range of 4,400 kilometers. Therefore, the Boeing 767-200ER can fly nonstop approximately 7,800 kilometers further.
  • The Boeing 767-200ER can hold 24,140 gallons of fuel, which is 18,830 gallons more than the Boeing 737-300’s tank capacity of 5,310 gallons.

Boeing 737-300 vs Boeing 767-200ER Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Boeing 767-200ER can accommodate 216 passengers, which is about 88 passengers more than Boeing 737-300’s seating capacity.
  • The Boeing 767-200ER’s max seating capacity is 290 passengers, compared to 149 passengers of the Boeing 737-300.

About the Boeing 737-300

The Boeing 737-300, launched in the early 1980s, is a seminal model in the 737 family, known for ushering in the era of modern narrow-body jetliners. As the first of the 737 Classic series, it was developed to meet the growing demand for more efficient and higher-capacity short to medium-haul aircraft. Compared to the Original 737 models, the -300 featured new wings, a redesigned tailfin, and improvements inside the cabin. Fast forward a bit, the 737-300 was eventually replaced by the 737-700 of the Next Generation series.

The 737-300 stretches 109.6 feet (33.4 meters) from nose to tail, with a wingspan of 94.5 feet (28.8 meters). This aircraft was Boeing's answer to the need for a larger capacity in the single-aisle market, accommodating 128 passengers in a typical two-class layout. Its increased length over its predecessor, the 737-200, allowed for additional seating, making it a more economical choice for airlines.

Equipped with two CFM International CFM56-3B1 engines, the 737-300 produces a total thrust of 44,000 lbf (196.0 kN). This enhancement in power, combined with a fuel capacity of 5,310 US gallons (20,100 liters), extended the aircraft's range to 2,376 nautical miles (4,400 kilometers). The 737-300's cruise speed of 495 mph (796 km/h) made it a swift and efficient option for airlines, reducing flight times on popular domestic and regional routes.

The 737-300 marked a shift in the commercial aviation landscape, competing with models like the McDonnell Douglas MD-80. Its launch was pivotal for Boeing, demonstrating the company's ability to innovate and adapt to market shifts. The 737-300's popularity was driven by its improved efficiency, greater capacity, and enhanced performance, meeting the needs of airlines expanding their short-haul operations.

Major carriers such as Southwest Airlines and United Airlines incorporated the Boeing 737-300 into their fleets, capitalizing on its operational advantages. The American carriers purchased a majority of the -300, with 299 units between the two airlines. The aircraft's role in these fleets was significant, as it enabled airlines to offer more frequent services and open new routes, particularly in the domestic and regional markets.

About the Boeing 767-200ER

Introduced in 1984, the Boeing 767-200ER (Extended Range) is a twin engine, wide-body commercial aircraft that represents an advanced variant of the original 767-200. This updated version was designed to offer enhanced range and capacity in the long-haul market. The -200ER spearheaded the growth of Transatlantic twinjet flights under Extended-range Twin-engine Operational Performance Standards (ETOPS) regulations.

The 767-200ER features a length of 48.5 meters (159.2 feet) and a wingspan of 47.6 meters (156.2 feet). With a wing area of 283.3 square meters (3049.4 square feet), the aircraft is engineered to provide a balance of aerodynamic efficiency and structural capability, accommodating long-range flights with a substantial payload. One of the distinctive aspects of the 767-200ER is its extended range capability, with a total fuel capacity of 91,380 liters (24,140 US gallons), facilitating a range of up to 12,200 kilometers (6,587 nautical miles). This extended range makes the aircraft particularly suited for intercontinental routes, allowing airlines to operate non-stop flights over longer distances. The aircraft is powered by a choice of high-thrust engines from manufacturers like Pratt & Whitney, General Electric, and Rolls-Royce. These engines provide a total maximum thrust of 540.0 kN (121,200 lbf), contributing to the 767-200ER's performance in extended-range operations.

In terms of passenger capacity, the 767-200ER typically accommodates around 216 passengers in a dual-class configuration. This layout often includes a business class with more spacious seating and a larger economy class in a twin-aisle, 2-3-2 arrangement. The maximum capacity of the aircraft can reach up to 290 passengers, depending on the airline's specific configuration. Competing in the market against other wide-body aircraft such as the Airbus A300 and A310, the 767-200ER carved out a niche for itself in the long-haul segment. Its introduction was timely, aligning with the increasing globalization of air travel and the need for more efficient, long-range aircraft. Notable airlines that have operated the Boeing 767-200ER include Delta Air Lines, American Airlines, and United Airlines.

In summary, the Boeing 767-200ER stands as a significant development in Boeing's 767 series, offering airlines a combination of extended range, capacity, and operational efficiency. Beyond its use for passenger flights, the 767 has been an important aircraft for both freight and military operations.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.