Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 737-600 vs. Boeing 767-300ER

vs.
Compare

737-600

vs.

767-300ER

Price (USD)
$57 Million$105 Million
First Flight
19981986
Body Type
Narrow-bodyWide-body
Length
31 m102 ft
54 m180 ft
Wingspan
34 m112 ft
47 m156 ft
Wing Area
124 m²1,341 ft²
283 m²3,049 ft²
Fuselage Width
3 m12 ft
5 m16 ft
Height
12 m41 ft
15 m51 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
66,000 kg145,505 lbs
186,900 kg412,044 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
CFMI CFM56Pratt & Whitney PW4000 / General Electric CF6 / Rolls-Royce RB211
Max Thrust Per Engine
101 kN22,700 lbf
274 kN61,500 lbf
Max Total Thrust
202 kN45,400 lbf
548 kN123,000 lbf
Fuel Capacity
26,000 l6,868 gal
90,700 l23,960 gal
Range
5,650 km3,051 nm
11,070 km5,977 nm
Cruise Speed
850 km/h528 mph
850 km/h528 mph
Typical Seating
123 pax261 pax
Max Seating
149 pax351 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 737-600 and Boeing 767-300ER

Boeing 737-600 vs Boeing 767-300ER Size Comparison

  • At 54.90 meters, the Boeing 767-300ER is 23.70 meters longer than the Boeing 737-600.
  • With a wingspan of 47.60 meters, the Boeing 767-300ER is 13.30 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 737-600 and Boeing 767-300ER have heights of 12.60 meters and 15.80 meters respectively - making the Boeing 767-300ER 3.20 meters taller.

Boeing 737-600 vs Boeing 767-300ER Range

  • Boeing 767-300ER’s range of 11,070 kilometers is greater than Boeing 737-600’s range of 5,650 kilometers. Therefore, the Boeing 767-300ER can fly nonstop approximately 5,420 kilometers further.
  • The Boeing 767-300ER can hold 23,960 gallons of fuel, which is 17,092 gallons more than the Boeing 737-600’s tank capacity of 6,868 gallons.

Boeing 737-600 vs Boeing 767-300ER Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Boeing 767-300ER can accommodate 261 passengers, which is about 138 passengers more than Boeing 737-600’s seating capacity.
  • The Boeing 767-300ER’s max seating capacity is 351 passengers, compared to 149 passengers of the Boeing 737-600.

About the Boeing 737-600

Launched in 1998, the Boeing 737-600 is the smallest aircraft in the 737 Next Generation (NG) series. It succeeded the 737-500, and was a significant evolution in Boeing's narrow-body offerings. It featured many upgraded features from the previous 737s, including aerodynamics, engines, and avionics. As the smallest NG variant, the 737-600 was designed for efficiency and adaptability, catering to airlines requiring a compact jet for short to medium-haul routes.

This aircraft extends 102.4 feet (31.2 meters) in length with a wingspan of 112.6 feet (34.3 meters). The 737-600, with a typical seating capacity for 123 passengers, offers an ideal balance between passenger comfort and efficiency, making it a fitting choice for airlines serving routes with moderate passenger demand. Equipped with two CFM International CFM56-7B20 engines, the 737-600 has a total thrust of 45,400 lbf (202.0 kN). This engine power, coupled with a fuel capacity of 6,868 US gallons (26,000 liters), gives the -600 a range of 3,051 nautical miles (5,650 kilometers). The 737-600 has a cruise speed of 528 mph (850 km/h) enabling airlines to maintain efficient and swift operations, particularly beneficial for regional network connections.

In the late 1990s and early 2000s, the Boeing 737-600 competed with aircraft such as the Airbus A318 and Bombardier CRJ series, offering airlines a modern alternative in the narrow-body market. Airlines including Scandinavian Airlines (SAS), Westjet, and Air Algerie operated the Boeing 737-600. Ultimately, the -600 variant was not a popular model of the 737 due to its economics. The -700, only slightly heavier, had a much greater payload. Additionally, the larger market was moving more towards higher capacity narrow-bodies with lower unit costs and greater revenue opportunities.

About the Boeing 767-300ER

The Boeing 767-300ER, an extended-range variant of the 767 family, entered service in 1988 as a response to the growing demand for efficient and versatile wide-body aircraft. This model, with its significant enhancements in range and capacity, has become a staple in the fleets of various airlines for long-haul operations. At its peak in the 1990's, a brand new 767-300ER was valued at roughly $85 million.

With a length of 54.9 meters (180.2 feet) and a wingspan of 47.6 meters (156.2 feet), the 767-300ER is designed for operational efficiency in both airport compatibility and aerodynamics. The wing area of 283.3 square meters (3049.4 square feet) contributes to the aircraft's stable and efficient flight characteristics, especially over extended distances.

The -300ER's increased range was made possible by larger fuel tanks and a higher max takeoff weight (MTOW) of 407,000 lbs (185,000 kgs). The updated variant has a fuel capacity of 90,700 liters (23,960 US gallons), allowing it to cover distances of up to 11,070 kilometers (5,977 nautical miles). This capability makes it particularly suitable for transcontinental and transoceanic routes, offering airlines the flexibility to connect distant cities with fewer stops. Engines options for the -300ER included Pratt & Whitney PW4000s, General Electric CF6s, or Rolls-Royce RB211s. These were capable of a total maximum thrust of 548.0 kN (123,000 lbf). The aircraft exhibits robust performance, necessary for long-haul flights carrying a full load of both passengers and cargo.

The cabin of the 767-300ER is designed to typically seat 261 passengers in a dual-class layout, with the potential to accommodate up to 351 passengers in a high-density configuration. The typical layout includes a spacious business class and a larger economy class, often arranged in a 2-3-2 seat configuration, balancing passenger comfort and density.

Competing in the wide-body market, the Boeing 767-300ER has faced competition from aircraft such as the Airbus A330 and the smaller A300. These models offer similar long-range capabilities and passenger capacities, making the market segment highly competitive. Many carriers have operated the 767-300ER, including Delta Air Lines, United Airlines, British Airways, Japan Airlines, and All Nippon Airways. These carriers have leveraged the aircraft's range and capacity to effectively serve a variety of long-haul routes, underlining its role as a versatile and reliable option in their fleet.

The Boeing 767-300ER's introduction and subsequent service record reflect its importance in the evolution of wide-body aircraft, particularly in the context of long-haul commercial aviation. Its combination of range, capacity, and operational flexibility has solidified its position as a significant player in the global aviation industry.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.