Airliner Comparison ToolCompare 60+ passenger aircraft models head to head!

Boeing 737-900ER vs. Airbus A321neo

vs.
Compare

737-900ER

vs.

A321neo

Price (USD)
$102 Million$129 Million
First Flight
20062016
Body Type
Narrow-bodyNarrow-body
Length
42 m138 ft
44 m146 ft
Wingspan
34 m112 ft
35 m117 ft
Wing Area
124 m²1,341 ft²
122 m²1,317 ft²
Fuselage Width
3 m12 ft
4 m13 ft
Height
12 m41 ft
11 m38 ft
Max Takeoff Weight
85,100 kg187,613 lbs
97,000 kg213,848 lbs
Number of Engines
22
Engine Options
CFMI CFM56CFMI LEAP-1A / P&W PW1000G
Max Thrust Per Engine
126 kN28,400 lbf
147 kN33,100 lbf
Max Total Thrust
252 kN56,800 lbf
294 kN66,200 lbf
Fuel Capacity
29,700 l7,846 gal
29,500 l7,793 gal
Range
5,900 km3,186 nm
5,423 km2,928 nm
Cruise Speed
850 km/h528 mph
832 km/h517 mph
Typical Seating
180 pax220 pax
Max Seating
215 pax244 pax

What Are the Differences Between the Boeing 737-900ER and Airbus A321neo

Boeing 737-900ER vs Airbus A321neo Size Comparison

  • At 44.50 meters, the Airbus A321neo is 2.40 meters longer than the Boeing 737-900ER.
  • With a wingspan of 35.80 meters, the Airbus A321neo is 1.50 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The Boeing 737-900ER and Airbus A321neo have heights of 12.60 meters and 11.80 meters respectively - making the Boeing 737-900ER 0.80 meters taller.

Boeing 737-900ER vs Airbus A321neo Range

  • Boeing 737-900ER’s range of 5,900 kilometers is greater than Airbus A321neo’s range of 5,423 kilometers. Therefore, the Boeing 737-900ER can fly nonstop approximately 477 kilometers further.
  • The Boeing 737-900ER can hold 7,846 gallons of fuel, which is 53 gallons more than the Airbus A321neo’s tank capacity of 7,793 gallons.

Boeing 737-900ER vs Airbus A321neo Seating

  • In a typical seating configuration, the Airbus A321neo can accommodate 220 passengers, which is about 40 passengers more than Boeing 737-900ER’s seating capacity.
  • The Airbus A321neo’s max seating capacity is 244 passengers, compared to 215 passengers of the Boeing 737-900ER.

About the Boeing 737-900ER

Introduced in 2006, the Boeing 737-900ER is a pivotal variant in the Next-Generation 737 series, offering airlines an ideal combination of extended range and increased passenger capacity for medium to long-haul routes. This aircraft, building upon the base model of the 737-900, incorporates significant advancements that enhance its operational flexibility and efficiency.

The 737-900ER's design extends to a length of 42.1 meters (138.1 feet), making it one of the longest aircraft in the 737 family. This extended fuselage allows for a higher passenger capacity, aligning with the growing demands for more economically efficient, high-density configurations in commercial aviation. Its wingspan of 34.3 meters (112.6 feet) and a wing area of 124.6 square meters (1341.0 square feet) contribute to the aircraft's aerodynamic performance. Equipped with powerful engines providing a total maximum thrust of 252.0 kN (56,800 lbf), the 737-900ER is well-suited for extended range operations, further enhancing its versatility for various route profiles. With a fuel capacity of 29,700 liters (7,846 US gallons), the aircraft achieves a range of approximately 5,900 kilometers (3,186 nautical miles), enabling it to operate longer routes previously beyond the reach of standard single-aisle aircraft.

The interior of the 737-900ER is configured to accommodate up to 180 passengers in a typical two-class setting, with the capability to seat up to 215 passengers in a denser, single-class arrangement. This flexibility makes the 737-900ER an adaptable solution for airlines to cater to different market demands. The cabin design focuses on enhancing passenger comfort, integrating modern amenities and spacious seating arrangements.

In the competitive landscape of commercial aviation, the 737-900ER stands out as a cost-effective option for airlines to service a wide spectrum of domestic and international routes. Operators such as Alaska Airlines, Delta Air Lines, and United Airlines have integrated the 737-900ER into their fleets, utilizing its operational efficiency and capacity to bolster and diversify their route networks. The closest alternative airliner to the 737-900ER in the Airbus A321neo.

Overall, the Boeing 737-900ER marks a significant evolution in the 737 series, bringing together the benefits of extended range and increased capacity while upholding the operational efficiency and reliability that the Next-Generation 737s are known for. Its role in the fleets of global airlines underscores its status as a versatile and efficient choice for medium to long-haul air travel.

About the Airbus A321neo

The Airbus A321neo is a significant evolution within the A320 family, distinguished by its new engines and enhancements in efficiency and range. This single-aisle, twin-engine airliner has been a key addition to several airlines' fleets, meeting the demands of both medium and long-haul routes.

One of the standout features of the A321neo is its engine technology, offering a choice between the CFM International LEAP-1A and the Pratt & Whitney PW1100G-JM. These engines are pivotal in reducing fuel consumption and emissions, contributing to the aircraft's operational efficiency. With a maximum takeoff weight of about 206,000 lbs, the A321neo's range extends up to 4,000 nautical miles (7,400 kilometers). The integration of "Sharklets" at the wingtips is a notable aerodynamic enhancement, reducing drag and further improving fuel efficiency. In terms of size, the A321neo extends 146.5 feet (44.6 meters) in length, with a wingspan of 117.5 feet (35.8 meters), making it the longest fuselage of the A320 family. It can accommodate up to 240 passengers, thanks to its "Cabin-Flex" configuration, which optimizes cabin space utilization.

Airlines such as American Airlines, IndiGo, and Turkish Airlines. have embraced the Airbus A321neo for its versatile capabilities. The aircraft's ability to efficiently serve various routes and passenger volumes has been a significant factor in its operational deployment. Developed in response to the aviation industry's push for more eco-friendly and efficient aircraft, the A321neo represents a balance between environmental responsibility and operational demands. Its design reflects a modern approach to commercial aviation, catering to airlines' needs for a sustainable, high-capacity narrow-body aircraft.

The A321neo is most comparable to Boeing's 757-200, 737 MAX 9, and 737 MAX 10. In the competitive market, the Airbus A321neo has demonstrated its value through its performance and adaptability. As of late 2023, there are over 1,100 A321neo aircraft in service, belonging to 88 different carriers. Even more impressive, there have been 5,400 orders for the A321neo since its inception.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Airliner Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.