F-35 Lightning II vs. MiG-23

The Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II is a family of single-seat, single-engine stealth multirole combat aircraft developed by Lockheed Martin, with principal partners Northrop Grumman and BAE Systems. Designed to perform air superiority and strike missions, it also provides electronic warfare and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities. The F-35 has three main variants: the conventional takeoff and landing F-35A, the short take-off and vertical-landing F-35B, and the carrier-based F-35C​​.

Production History: The F-35 was the culmination of the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) program, which merged various combat aircraft programs from the 1980s and 90s. It descends from the Lockheed Martin X-35, which in 2001 won the JSF competition over the Boeing X-32. The program has been supported by the United States, along with NATO and close U.S. allies. Despite the criticism for its size, complexity, and cost, the F-35 first flew in 2006 and entered service with the U.S. Marine Corps F-35B in July 2015, followed by the U.S. Air Force F-35A in August 2016 and the U.S. Navy F-35C in February 2019. Over 1000 units have been produced since 2006​​​​.

Design Features: The F-35 is known for its stealth capabilities, advanced sensor package, and electronic sensors like the Electro-Optical Distributed Aperture System (DAS) and the Electro-Optical Targeting System (EOTS). The F-35 is designed to replace aging fighter inventories such as the U.S. Air Force F-16s and A-10s, U.S. Navy F/A-18s, and U.S. Marine Corps AV-8B Harriers and F/A-18s​​​​.

Operational History: The F-35 first saw combat in 2018 with the Israeli Air Force. It is planned to be a cornerstone of NATO and U.S.-allied air power, with the U.S. planning to buy 2,456 F-35s through 2044. The aircraft is expected to operate until 2070. It is designed to provide pilots with unsurpassed situational awareness, positive target identification, and precision strike in all weather conditions​​.

Comparison with Similar Models:

F-35 Lightning II vs. F-22 Raptor

Stealth and Air Superiority: While both aircraft offer advanced stealth capabilities, the F-22 is optimized for air superiority with higher maneuverability and speed. In contrast, the F-35 emphasizes multirole flexibility, with superior sensor fusion and strike capabilities.

Network-Centric Warfare: The F-35 is designed from the ground up for network-centric warfare, with the ability to share information seamlessly with allied forces. The F-22 has significant data link capabilities but does not match the F-35's level of sensor integration and information distribution.

F-35 Lightning II vs. Su-57 "Felon"

Multirole Versatility vs. Air Dominance: The Su-57 is Russia's answer to fifth-generation capabilities, focusing on air dominance with some ground attack capabilities. The F-35, while capable in air-to-air combat, provides a broader multirole function.

Global Deployment and Support: The F-35 has seen widespread adoption among U.S. allies, benefiting from a multinational development program. The Su-57, while a technological showcase for Russia, has not achieved the same level of international deployment.

The Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-23, known by its NATO reporting name "Flogger," is a third-generation jet fighter developed by the Soviet Union in the late 1960s. The MiG-23 was designed to meet the need for a more versatile and capable fighter, capable of achieving Mach 2.35 speeds, and was introduced as a successor to the MiG-21. It served in various roles, including interceptor, ground-attack, and scouting.

Production History: The MiG-23 was introduced into service with the Soviet Air Forces in 1970. Over its production life, which spanned two decades, more than 5,000 units were built, making it one of the most produced fighter aircraft of its time. The MiG-23 was exported widely, serving in the air forces of over 30 countries, and saw action in numerous conflicts during the latter half of the 20th century.

Design Features: The MiG-23's most notable feature is its swing-wing design, which allows the wings to be set at different angles to optimize performance at various speeds. At lower speeds, the wings could be extended for better lift and maneuverability, while at higher speeds, they could be swept back to reduce drag. The aircraft was powered by a single large turbojet engine, equipped with an afterburner for additional thrust.

Operational History: The MiG-23 saw combat in several Middle Eastern conflicts, including the Yom Kippur War, the Iran-Iraq War, and the Syrian Civil War. It was used extensively by the Soviet Union in Afghanistan during the 1980s, where it was employed in both air-to-air combat and ground-attack roles. Despite its advanced design, the MiG-23 faced challenges in terms of maintenance and operational readiness, particularly in the hands of less experienced air forces.

Comparison with Similar Models:

MiG-23 vs. F-4 Phantom II

Role and Capabilities: Both the MiG-23 and F-4 Phantom II were designed as multi-role fighters capable of performing both air superiority and ground-attack missions. The MiG-23's variable-geometry wings provided it with a broader performance envelope, especially in terms of speed and altitude capabilities.

Performance: The F-4 Phantom II, while older, was known for its reliability, heavy payload, and versatility. In contrast, the MiG-23 offered better agility at high speeds and a more sophisticated radar and missile armament for air-to-air engagements.

MiG-23 vs. F-14 Tomcat

Design Evolution: The F-14 Tomcat and the MiG-23 were both developed around the same time and featured variable-geometry wings. This design was chosen by both manufacturers for similar reasons: to provide excellent performance across a wide range of speeds and altitudes.

Operational Capabilities: The F-14 was primarily designed as a fleet defense interceptor for the U.S. Navy and excelled in long-range air-to-air engagements. The MiG-23, while also capable in the interceptor role, was more versatile, being used extensively in ground-attack missions in addition to air superiority roles.