Fighter Jet Comparison ToolCompare 25+ military fighter aircraft head to head!

F-4 Phantom II vs. F-16 Fighting Falcon

vs.
Compare

F-4

vs.

F-16

Role
Fighter-bomberMulitrole fighter
Generation
3rd generation4th generation
National Origin
United StatesUnited States
Manufacturer
McDonnell DouglasGeneral Dynamics
Price (USD)
$3 Million$64 Million
Primary Users
US NavyUS Air Force
First Flight
19581974
Last Production Year
1981In Production
# Units Built
5,195>4600
Status
RetiredIn Service
Seats
21 (F-16C) / 2 (F-16D)
Length
19 m63 ft
15 m49 ft
Wingspan
11 m38 ft
10 m32 ft
Wing Area
49 m²529 ft²
28 m²301 ft²
Height
5 m16 ft
4 m16 ft
Empty Weight
13,757 kg30,330 lbs
8,573 kg18,900 lbs
Gross Weight
18,824 kg41,500 lbs
12,020 kg26,500 lbs
MTOW
28,030 kg61,795 lbs
19,187 kg42,300 lbs
Fuel Capacity
7,257 kg16,000 lbs
3,175 kg7,000 lbs
Number of Engines
21
Engine Type
TurbojetTurbofan
Engine Manufacturer
General ElectricGeneral Electric
Engine Model
J79-GE-17AF110-GE-129
Dry Thrust
53 kN11,905 lbs
76 kN17,155 lbs
Thrust w/ Afterburner
79 kN17,845 lbf
131 kN29,500 lbf
Max Thrust
159 kN35,690 lbf
131 kN29,500 lbf
Max Speed (Mach)
Mach 2.23Mach 2.05
Top Speed
2,371 km/h1,473 mph
2,177 km/h1,353 mph
Range
2,815 km1,520 nm
4,223 km2,280 nm
Rate of Climb
208 m/s41,000 ft/min
254 m/s50,000 ft/min
Ceiling
17,069 m56,000 ft
17,678 m58,000 ft
G Limit
6 g9 g

What Are the Differences Between the F-4 Phantom II and F-16 Fighting Falcon

F-4 Phantom II vs F-16 Fighting Falcon Size Comparison

  • At 19.20 meters, the F-4 Phantom II is 4.10 meters longer than the F-16 Fighting Falcon.
  • With a wingspan of 11.70 meters, the F-4 Phantom II is 1.70 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The wing area of the F-4 Phantom II is 0.10 meters bigger than that of the F-16 Fighting Falcon’s 4.90 meters.

F-4 Phantom II vs F-16 Fighting Falcon Price

  • The F-16 Fighting Falcon is more expensive than the F-4 Phantom II, with a unit cost of approximately 64 million compared to the F-4 Phantom II’s unit cost of approximately 3 million.

F-4 Phantom II vs F-16 Fighting Falcon Speed

  • The F-4 Phantom II has a top speed of 1,473 miles per hour, and the F-16 Fighting Falcon has a top speed of 1,353 miles per hour. Head to head, this makes the F-4 Phantom II 120 miles per hour faster than the F-16 Fighting Falcon.

About the F-4 Phantom II

The McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II is one of the most significant fighter jets in military aviation history, known for its versatility, powerful performance, and distinctive appearance. Initially developed for the US Navy in the late 1950s, the F-4 Phantom II set numerous speed and altitude records for its time and was later adopted by the U.S. Marine Corps and the U.S. Air Force.

Production History: The F-4 Phantom II was designed to meet the U.S. Navy's need for a supersonic fighter capable of carrying a significant payload over long distances, without sacrificing speed and maneuverability. The aircraft saw extensive combat in the Vietnam War, serving in both ground-attack and air superiority roles. Production ran from 1958 to 1981, with over 5,000 units built, making it one of the most produced American supersonic military aircraft.

Design Features: Characterized by its large size, twin engines, and tandem two-seat configuration, the F-4 Phantom II was designed without an internal cannon in its initial versions, relying instead on missiles for air combat. The F-4's distinctive design included drooping tail fins and diagonal tail wings, contributing to its recognizable silhouette.

Operational History: The F-4 Phantom II saw extensive use in the Vietnam War, where it performed admirably in dogfighting against lighter North Vietnamese aircraft, as well as in bombing missions. It was also a key figure in American air power throughout the Cold War. The F-4 served with distinction in later conflicts such as the Persian Gulf War and remained in use by several countries into the 21st century.

Comparison with Similar Models:

F-4 Phantom II vs. F-105 Thunderchief

Role and Capabilities: Both aircraft were critical to the U.S. Air Force during the Vietnam War. The F-105 was primarily used for deep strike bombing missions, while the F-4 served in a wider range of roles, including air superiority, fleet defense, and reconnaissance.

Performance: The F-105 Thunderchief, known as the "Thud," was the faster of the two at low altitude and carried a larger bomb load for ground-attack missions. However, the F-4 Phantom II's superior agility, higher service ceiling, and ability to operate from carriers made it a more adaptable and formidable aircraft.

F-4 Phantom II vs. MiG-21

Design: The MiG-21 was the Soviet Union's counterpart to the F-4 during the Vietnam War. It was smaller, lighter, and offered greater agility, designed primarily for air superiority with a secondary ground-attack capability. In contrast, the F-4 was a larger, more versatile fighter-bomber that could engage targets at longer ranges with its superior radar and missile armament.

Operational Capabilities: The MiG-21's agility made it a formidable adversary in visual range dogfights, while the F-4's powerful engines, advanced avionics, and diverse weapons loadout gave it an edge in beyond-visual-range engagements and multirole missions.

About the F-16 Fighting Falcon

The General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon, now produced by Lockheed Martin, is a single-engine, supersonic, multirole fighter aircraft originally developed for the United States Air Force. It was designed as an air superiority day fighter but evolved into a successful all-weather multirole aircraft. Over 4,600 units have been produced since its introduction in the late 1970s, and it remains in service with the USAF and 25 other nations.

Production History: The F-16 was first introduced on 17 August 1978, following its first official flight on 2 February 1974. Initially conceived under the Lightweight Fighter (LWF) program, the F-16 was selected for its agility, maneuverability, and versatility. General Dynamics began its production, which was later continued by Lockheed Martin after 1993.

Design Features: Notable for its bubble canopy for better visibility, side-mounted control stick for ease of maneuvering, and an ejection seat inclined 30 degrees to reduce g-force effects on the pilot, the F-16 was pioneering in incorporating fly-by-wire flight control systems, making it one of the most agile fighters of its time. It features an internal M61 Vulcan cannon and can carry numerous missiles and bombs across 11 hardpoints.

Operational History: The F-16 has seen extensive action across numerous conflicts, showcasing its capabilities in air-to-air combat and air-to-surface attacks. It has been a staple in operations such as the 1991 Gulf War, Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan, and the invasion of Iraq in 2003. The aircraft's versatility has also made it a favorite for the Thunderbirds, the USAF's aerial demonstration team.

Comparison with Similar Models:

F-16 Fighting Falcon vs. F/A-18 Hornet

Role and Capabilities: Both aircraft are multirole fighters capable of air-to-air and air-to-ground missions. The F-16 is known for its agility in air combat, while the F/A-18 offers additional versatility with carrier operations capability.

Performance: The F-16 boasts a top speed of over Mach 2 and a range of 2,002 miles, making it exceptionally effective in quick strikes and air superiority roles. The F/A-18, while also capable of reaching high speeds and offering significant payload capacity, is optimized for carrier-based operations, providing a blend of speed, firepower, and versatility.

F-16 Fighting Falcon vs. F-35 Lightning II

Technology: The F-35 represents a generational leap in technology with stealth capabilities, advanced sensor fusion, and significantly improved avionics. In contrast, the F-16 is less stealthy but is highly maneuverable and has been continuously upgraded to enhance its combat effectiveness.

Role: While the F-16 was designed as a cost-effective, highly maneuverable multirole fighter, the F-35 is intended to serve multiple roles with a focus on stealth, reconnaissance, ground attack, and air superiority.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Fighter Jet Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.