Fighter Jet Comparison ToolCompare 25+ military fighter aircraft head to head!

MiG-27 vs. Mikoyan MiG-29

vs.
Compare

MiG-27

vs.

MiG-29

Role
Ground-attackAir superiority fighter
Generation
No generationFourth generation
National Origin
Soviet UnionSoviet Union
Manufacturer
MikoyanMikoyan
Price (USD)
$7 Million$20 Million
Primary Users
Soviet Air ForcesRussian Aerospace Forces
First Flight
19701977
Last Production Year
1994In Production
# Units Built
1,075>1,600
Status
Limited ServiceIn Service
Seats
11
Length
17 m56 ft
17 m56 ft
Wingspan
14 m45 ft
11 m37 ft
Wing Area
37 m²402 ft²
38 m²409 ft²
Height
5 m16 ft
4 m15 ft
Empty Weight
11,907 kg26,250 lbs
11,000 kg24,250 lbs
Gross Weight
20,298 kg44,750 lbs
14,901 kg32,850 lbs
MTOW
20,670 kg45,570 lbs
17,999 kg39,680 lbs
Fuel Capacity
5,674 kg12,510 lbs
3,502 kg7,720 lbs
Number of Engines
12
Engine Type
TurbojetTurbofan
Engine Manufacturer
TumanskyKlimov
Engine Model
R-29-B-300 R-33
Dry Thrust
79 kN17,600 lbs
49 kN11,110 lbs
Thrust w/ Afterburner
113 kN25,400 lbf
82 kN18,340 lbf
Max Thrust
113 kN25,400 lbf
163 kN36,680 lbf
Max Speed (Mach)
Mach 1.77Mach 2.30
Top Speed
1,885 km/h1,171 mph
2,446 km/h1,520 mph
Range
778 km420 nm
1,426 km770 nm
Rate of Climb
198 m/s39,000 ft/min
330 m/s65,000 ft/min
Ceiling
14,021 m46,000 ft
17,983 m59,000 ft
G Limit
7 g9 g

What Are the Differences Between the MiG-27 and Mikoyan MiG-29

MiG-27 vs Mikoyan MiG-29 Size Comparison

  • At 17.30 meters, the Mikoyan MiG-29 is 0.20 meters longer than the MiG-27.
  • With a wingspan of 14 meters, the MiG-27 is 2.60 meters wider from wingtip to wingtip.
  • The wing area of the MiG-27 is 0.30 meters bigger than that of the Mikoyan MiG-29’s 4.70 meters.

MiG-27 vs Mikoyan MiG-29 Price

  • The Mikoyan MiG-29 is more expensive than the MiG-27, with a unit cost of approximately 20 million compared to the MiG-27’s unit cost of approximately 7 million.

MiG-27 vs Mikoyan MiG-29 Speed

  • The Mikoyan MiG-29 has a top speed of 1,520 miles per hour, and the MiG-27 has a top speed of 1,171 miles per hour. Head to head, this makes the Mikoyan MiG-29 349 miles per hour faster than the MiG-27.

About the MiG-27

The Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-27, known by its NATO reporting name "Flogger-D/J," is a ground-attack aircraft derived from the MiG-23 fighter aircraft, designed and built by the Soviet Union. Introduced in the 1970s, the MiG-27 was specifically optimized for the air-to-ground role, featuring significant modifications to enhance its low-altitude flying capability and survivability over the battlefield.

Production History: The development of the MiG-27 was a direct result of the experience gained from the MiG-23's performance, with a focus on improving its functionality in a dedicated ground-attack role. The MiG-27 entered service in the mid-1970s, with production continuing until 1986. Over 1,000 units were produced, serving in the air forces of the Soviet Union and several other nations.

Design Features: Key design changes from the MiG-23 to the MiG-27 included a redesigned nose to accommodate a ground-attack radar and an optical sight, simpler fixed intakes to replace the variable-geometry intakes, and strengthened landing gear to withstand the rigors of low-altitude operations. The MiG-27's armament was centered around a powerful 6-barrel rotary 30mm cannon, with hardpoints for a variety of bombs, rockets, and missiles tailored for ground-attack missions.

Operational History: The MiG-27 played a significant role in several regional conflicts, most notably in the Soviet–Afghan War, where it was used extensively for close air support and interdiction missions. Its service life extended into the 21st century with several air forces, demonstrating its durability and effectiveness in combat.

Comparison with Similar Models:

MiG-27 vs. Su-25

Role and Capabilities: Both the MiG-27 and the Su-25 were designed for close air support and ground-attack missions. While the MiG-27 was adapted from a fighter design and retained some air-to-air capabilities, the Su-25 was purpose-built as a ground-attack aircraft.

Performance: The Su-25 offers superior survivability in a ground-attack role due to its armored cockpit and redundancy in critical systems. The MiG-27, however, benefits from higher speeds and flexibility offered by its variable-geometry wings, allowing for quick ingress and egress from the target area.

MiG-27 vs. A-10 Thunderbolt II

Design Evolution: The A-10 Thunderbolt II and the MiG-27 were developed around the same time, with both aircraft focusing on close air support and combat survivability. The A-10 was designed around its powerful GAU-8 Avenger rotary cannon, with an emphasis on loiter capability and battlefield survivability.

Operational Capabilities: While the A-10 is renowned for its tank-killing capabilities, particularly with its armor-piercing ammunition, the MiG-27 offered a broader range of weapons for engaging both soft and hard targets.

About the Mikoyan MiG-29

The Mikoyan MiG-29, also referred to as its NATO reporting name, "Fulcrum," is a fourth-generation jet fighter aircraft developed by the Soviet Union in the 1970s. Designed to counter American fighters such as the F-15 Eagle and F-16 Fighting Falcon, the MiG-29 entered service with the Soviet Air Force in 1982. It is renowned for its maneuverability, high thrust-to-weight ratio, and advanced avionics.

Production History: The development of the MiG-29 began in the early 1970s, with the first prototype taking to the skies in 1977. Its design focused on producing a highly maneuverable fighter capable of engaging enemy aircraft at close ranges, while also being able to perform at high speeds and altitudes. Over its production life, the MiG-29 has been continuously updated and modified, resulting in several variants to enhance performance.

Design Features: The MiG-29 features a twin-engine configuration that contributes to its high power output and agility. The aircraft is equipped with a suite of sensors and targeting systems, including a phased array radar, allowing it to track and engage enemy targets beyond visual range. Its airframe design emphasizes aerodynamic efficiency and maneuverability, with leading-edge root extensions (LERX) improving lift and angle of attack performance. The Fulcrum is armed with a mix of air-to-air missiles, a 30mm cannon, and can also carry air-to-ground ordnance.

Operational History: The MiG-29 has seen combat in several conflicts since its introduction, including the Gulf War, the Yugoslav Wars, and the Russo-Georgian War. Despite its success, the MiG-29 has faced challenges with maintenance and operational readiness, particularly in countries without the infrastructure or technical capability to support such advanced aircraft.

Comparison with Similar Models:

MiG-29 vs. F-16 Fighting Falcon

Role and Capabilities: Both the MiG-29 and the F-16 were designed as multi-role fighters capable of performing a wide range of air-to-air and air-to-ground missions. The MiG-29 emphasizes air superiority with its superior radar and dogfighting capabilities, while the F-16 offers greater versatility and ground attack precision.

Performance: The MiG-29 boasts superior maneuverability and thrust-to-weight ratio, allowing for exceptional agility in dogfights. The F-16, however, has a longer range and a more advanced avionics package, providing better multi-role flexibility.

MiG-29 vs. F/A-18 Hornet

Design Evolution: The F/A-18 was developed as a carrier-based multi-role fighter, with an emphasis on versatility and operational flexibility. The MiG-29, was primarily designed for air superiority but been adapted for various roles and environments.

Operational Capabilities: The MiG-29's design provides it with a slight edge in air-to-air combat, particularly in terms of speed and vertical maneuverability. The F/A-18, conversely, excels in multi-role missions due to its carrier compatibility, advanced avionics, and ability to conduct precision strikes.

Share:
Values shown may not be 100% accurate, as some metrics are averages or only represent certain production years and configurations. Engine specs are based on the best options available.

Related Fighter Jet Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Learn more about the WebFlite Aircraft Comparison Tool.

What is this comparison tool?

WebFlite’s Aircraft Comparison Tool allows users to contrast the specifications of over 100 airliner, freighter, and fighter jet models. The head-to-head comparisons include data related to size, weight, capacity, performance, and much more! Whether you want to compare similar aircraft, old vs new, big vs small - you can find it here at WebFlite!

How do you use this tool?

The Aircraft Comparison Tool is extremely easy to use! First, select your type of aircraft - Airliners, Freighters, or Fighter Jets. When the page reloads, select an aircraft from each of the two drop-down menus below the aircraft illustrations, and then click the blue “Compare” button. The page will automatically update and display those two aircraft and their specs! You can start a new comparison by changing either one or both aircraft from the drop-downs, and clicking “Compare” again. You can also change the aircraft type at the top of the page.

Where does the aircraft data come from?

The data for these aircraft has been scraped from a few sources, including manufacturer websites, government databases, and Wikipedia. While the data is fairly accurate, we cannot guarantee it all to be 100% exact. This is mainly due to discrepancies between sub-models and configurations. Most aircraft in this comparison tool will include what variant its data is based off of.

What are the most popular aircraft comparisons?
Can I share this tool or a comparison?

Yes! Please feel free to share this tool or any specific aircraft comparison with friends, family, or on social media! You may also share on your own website, but please include a link to the tool! We appreciate any support with helping us grow!

webflite-logoWebFlite
2023 WebFlite. All rights reserved.